The American Coal Council: the Pre-eminent Business Voice of the American Coal Industry

Member Login

ACC - Please note this is an archived site and no longer maintained. Go to www.americancoalcouncil.org for the current website

Using baking soda to stop global warming

Submitted by admin on Tue, 2007-12-11 08:24.

 

Now you can help stop global warming and make a light and fluffy cake at the same time. Just ask the people at Skyonic Corporation.

The Skyonic website notes that their process was created to help reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuel plants and therefore could help to address the challenges associated with global climate change and impending carbon reduction legislation. According to the site, the process uses waste heat and onsite production of sodium hydroxide to profitably remove CO2, acid gases, and heavy metals from flue gases. The carbon dioxide is stored in a stable form as sodium bicarbonate "(better-than-food-grade baking soda)," which can then be used in industrial processes, or landfilled. The process also "produces clean (non-methane-based) hydrogen and low-energy chlorine."

A recent CNet/News.com article on the process described more of the process and the pilot program that Skyonics is conducting with ACC member company Luminant Energy to help bring this technology to the market.

(Joe David) Jones, the founder and CEO of Skyonic, has come up with an industrial process called SkyMine that captures 90 percent of the carbon dioxide coming out of smoke stacks and mixes it with sodium hydroxide to make sodium bicarbonate, or baking soda. The energy required for the reaction to turn the chemicals into baking soda comes from the waste heat from the factory.

"It is cleaner than food-grade (baking soda)," he said.

The system also removes 97 percent of the heavy metals, as well as most of the sulfur and nitrogen compounds, Jones said.

Luminant, a utility formerly known as TXU, installed a pilot version of the system at its Big Brown Steam Electric Station in Fairfield, Texas, last year. Skyonic, meanwhile, hopes to install a system that will consume the greenhouse gas output of a large--500 megawatts or so--power plant around 2009. Skyonic is currently designing one of these large systems.

The article also noted that, if successful, the process could help reduce the need for mining sodium hydroxide and replace the need for installing scrubbers.

If tests prove successful and the product can be brought to market, it could be a boon for the industry, regulators, the environment, and electricity users (read: pretty much everyone.)

"Any discussion of climate

"Any discussion of climate change pro or con that is simple enough that a non climate scientist can understand it is inherently dumbed down to the point of being meaningless." Yes, no one, absolutely no one, should have an opinion on global climate unless we have a doctorate degree in climate science. Why should ANYONE care that you think it DOES or does not exist? Shut up, sit down, because your opinion doesn't matter, Mr No Degree in Climate Science. Arrogantly assuming that only the elite few may have an opinion and equating everyone that has an opinion without study at an university as treating science like it's American Idol, is idiotic, arrogant at best. People need to form opinions, because much of our politicians are basing their campaigns and policy around the environmental movement. Some people are followers that do treat these issues like a popularity contest, but to label that first poster as one without knowing how much it has studied the issue, just makes you a prick.

I myself am not convinced

I myself am not convinced that global warming exists, but even if it doesn't, something that takes an unused waste product and turns it into a usefull, profitable consumer good is fine by me. It's just that last bit that bugs me: is this a profitable process? If the materials that go into the creation of the baking soda are more expensive than the end result, this idea will never go anywhere.

Mr. Anon, Is there a

Mr. Anon, Is there a particular reason anyone should care weather you personally believe global warming exists? It takes the reading of lots of journal papers and likely years of graduate study to have a clue about climate science. Why do people believe science is the same as American Idol... that decisions should be made as some popularity contest courting public opinion. It's a flawed premise. Any discussion of climate change pro or con that is simple enough that a non climate scientist can understand it is inherently dumbed down to the point of being meaningless.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • You may use [acidfree:xx] tags to display acidfree videos or images inline.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Coalblog

Industry Sponsors

Industry Info








Newsletter

Syndicate

Syndicate content